Sharp Objects Review

Photograph via Google
Photograph via Google

I enjoyed Sharp Objects so much, starting it on Sunday, a freezing cold afternoon fit only for nesting and finishing it just before bed the following day. It’s what one would term ‘unputdownable’ if there were such a word. (Is there such a word?)

The thing about Gillian Flynn in my eyes is that she’s good. She’s really good. There’s no denying that the woman knows how to spin a dark and atmospheric yarn with the best of them.

Her characters are so well padded that they appear before you as if they were actually living and breathing; and however you feel about them, I’m thinking about Nick and Amy Dunne now in Gone Girl, they feel real.

*GONE GIRL SPOILER AHEAD*

After I read the aforementioned GG, I was told (or read somewhere) that it wasn’t Flynn’s best book. Hard to qualify this I know, given that these things are subjective but I admit that I was curious. It feels like I talk about that book a lot, of how I had loved it a lot, couldn’t stop reading it until it ended and left me enraged.

I ranted to every person I knew had read it about how it didn’t make sense and how it would never ever happen.

One colleague liked it and explained why in her own words, which made me examine it from another angle. I suppose, as with the Fifty Shades Trilogy, sometimes you have to accept that just because you wouldn’t live a certain way within a relationship, doesn’t mean other people don’t.

Some people make extraordinary things work and sometimes dysfunctional is functional, to them. (See also the film Secretary).

I digress but what I want to make clear here is that I would, and most likely will, read everything that Flynn writes from now on because I enjoy the way she writes. And you know what? I read Dark Places not long after Gone Girl and I did think it was better.

I think Sharp Objects is even better than that.

Camille Preaker is a reporter in Chicago. Not exactly setting the world alight with her journalistic prowess, even she’s not convinced she’s any good. But when a second murder is committed, in her own hometown, she has little choice but to stage her own homecoming. Is there a serial killer terrorising the small Missouri town? And will Camille be the one to break the story before larger and better newspapers get wind of the story?

Did I mention that I loved this tale? It’s very Gothic in its telling, based around the pristine home of Camille’s mother, Adora, the most revered woman in town, and the town itself, Wind Gap. Adora is a woman mourning the death of her daughter, Marian, who died when Camille was young. She now has another daughter, precocious, gorgeous Amma. Camille doesn’t know her half-sister at all, and sees her return to Wind Gap, albeit a reluctant one, as her opportunity to get to know her a bit.

I liked Camille a great deal. I get that she’s probably not supposed to be that likeable, given her past and issues, but I did. She’s been damaged in so many ways, not least by the cold and usual way in which she has been brought up by Adora. Adora has a unique mothering style, now devoted entirely to 13-year-old Amma, who plays a good game.

Sharp-ObjectsPart angel, part witch, Camille herself becomes fascinated with her little sister, watching her run rings around the townsfolk. What is this strange hold she has? More importantly though, is the matter of why she is back in the first place: who kidnapped and killed two girls, a year apart? And, why?

As the town becomes overshadowed by the rapidly spreading unease, Camille starts to build a story for each of the dead girls, stitching together witness accounts of their characters with a bit of urban legend mixed in. Were they chosen or was it random?

I’ll leave it here. All I can say is, if you enjoy a thriller that has you panting for the ending, while lamenting the fact that you’ll soon have to move on, then this is a good bet.

Book details:

  • Sharp Objects
  • Publisher: W&N; New Ed edition (17 Sept. 2007)
  • ISBN-10: 0753822210
  • ISBN-13: 978-0753822210
  • Bought paperback (new)
Advertisements

Reading List

Yesterday, while spending an obscene amount of time shopping for stationery with my friend L, she asked me to help her find some good reads. She’d be the first to admit she’s not a book-worm so I promised her I would write a list of my favourite all time books and get it to her so she can start building a collection.

(I’m not saying my opinion is the be all, it’s a guide rather than a compulsory reading assignment). What can I say? My friend trusts me.

I thought I would turn that list into a blog post soon. In the meantime, here’s a look at my most pressing To Read list. I’ve been a little off the boil literature wise since December but am getting back in the game now.

Can’t wait to get my mitts on the following:

IMG_20150118_115652
Hello babies

In no particular order:

Geek Love by Katherine Dunn
A birthday gift from my Sister-in-law, this has been on my Amazon wish list for a long time. Maddie said she read the back and knew it was for me, even before she realised it was on there. I cannot wait to dig in.

Bone Jack by Sara Crowe
I absolutely loved Crowe’s Campari for Breakfast (reviewed here) and couldn’t put it down. So I have nothing but high hopes for this. The former book was reminiscent of early Sue Townsend and that can only ever be a really good thing. I think Sara Crowe is one to watch.

Bellman & Black by Diane Setterfield
Another second visit, this one has been on my radar ever since I read The Thirteenth Tale. Setterfield can really spin a yarn spiked with all sorts of surprises. Perfect for cold Winter’s nights and tea. Lots of tea.

Sharp Objects by Gillian Flynn
I have a love/hate relationship with Flynn. I mean Gone Girl was hard to put down until it pissed me off so much I had to get as far away from it as possible. Dark Places was good though and I’ve heard word on the street that this is a corker too. Some people believe that GG is the worst of Gillian’s trilogy so that bodes well.

IMG_20150118_115726Yes Please by Amy Poehler
Hello, it’s Amy’s first book full of personal stories. What could be better?

The Paying Guests by Sarah Waters
Ms Waters is in my top three Favourite Authors and I think this might be why I haven’t yet thrown
myself head first into this story. She’s never let me down before and I have no reason to believe she will start now, but I’m still going to take my time.

Reviews of each to follow.

What are you reading right now? I’d love to know!

Best Films of 2014: Voluptuous Edition

My favourite films of 2014, in no particular order.

big-bad-wolves

Big Bad Wolves (2013)

Directors: Aharon KeshalesNavot Papushado

IMDB Synopsis: A series of brutal murders puts the lives of three men on a collision course: The father of the latest victim now out for revenge, a vigilante police detective operating outside the boundaries of law, and the main suspect in the killings – a religious studies teacher arrested and released due to a police blunder.

My Thoughts:

Technically, this is a 2013 film so probably has no business being on this list but I really don’t care. It originally popped onto my radar with an endorsement from Quentin Tarantino, who said this was the best film of the year. I mean, he didn’t call me directly or anything, I saw his tagline on the internet and took it upon myself to check it out. I don’t always because let’s face it, Mr Tarantino hasn’t always been right (Hostel) but I thank him for this one.

I’ll try to keep these segments to bite-sized chunks, and not bog you down with too much waffle. Just know that BBW is not a pleasant film. It is hard to endure and frustrating to the point that, if you’re anything like me, you will be yelling at the screen towards the end.

It is brilliant and I have recommended it to lots of my less squeamish friends with the disclaimer, “It’s fucked up but amazing!” If you like your humour pitch black, your characters grubby and your areas as grey as fog (in terms of right and wrong), then this might be your film!

night

Nightcrawler 

Director: Dan Gilroy

IMDB Synopsis: When Lou Bloom, a driven man desperate for work, muscles into the world of L.A. crime journalism, he blurs the line between observer and participant to become the star of his own story. Aiding him in his effort is Nina, a TV-news veteran.

My Thoughts:

Another grubby little number, this time taking to the streets of Los Angeles in hot pursuit of Jake Gyllenhaal’s creepy (for want of a better word) Lou Bloom, a man on a dubious mission to become the very best Crime Journalist/Ambulance Chaser in town.

I loved this movie. Jake is one of my favourites at the moment and he doesn’t disappoint as our desperate protagonist. He’s not very nice but a part of me wanted him to rise to the top of his game, however niche. Not really a feel good movie but compelling nonetheless.

maps_to_the_stars_ver9_xlg

Maps to the Stars

Director: David Cronenberg

IMDB Synopsis: A tour into the heart of a Hollywood family chasing celebrity, one another and the relentless ghosts of their pasts.

My Thoughts:

I loved this and boy, is it nasty. Centred around a slew of famous and non-famous people living in the heart of Hollywood, it is an interesting and dark look at celebrity; of how fragile, fleeting and damaging it can be, if you’re lucky enough to ever taste it.

Mia W is always mesmerising and here she plays troubled Agatha, daughter of self-help author, Stafford Weiss (John Cusack). Also in the picture, is Agatha’s younger brother, Benjie, a Beiber-esque child star with his own issues.

On the other side of town, we meet Havana Segrand (Julianne Moore), a washed up actress hoping to make a star turn in the remake of a film previously played by her late mother, Oscar nominated (for the aforementioned role) Clarice.

The climax is shocking to say the least and stuck with me for a long time after the credits stopped rolling, which is nothing new when dealing with Cronenberg of course. I was very impressed with the nuanced performances of the all-star cast and even Robert Pattinson‘s wannabe actor/limousine drive, Jerome, holds up well. A definite recommendation from me.

7e8b116f-3791-4fcb-9794-005878bef342

Nymphomania (Volumes 1&2)

Director: Lars von Trier

IMDB Synopsis: A self-diagnosed nymphomaniac recounts her erotic experiences to the man who saved her after a beating.

My Thoughts:

Firstly, Uma Thurman‘s Mrs. H steals the show entirely, you will love her. Secondly, and I know it’s all there on the front of the tin, there is a lot of sex in this film. If you are at all prudish or averse to looking at a lot of penis/flap action then there’s really no getting away from it, so maybe this isn’t the flick for you.

But to write it off as gratuitous is probably unfair as I think the film is extremely well crafted. I love Von Trier anyway, though I have had my moments of doubt (the horrible Antichrist) so I went in with a clear idea of what to expect. I was pleasantly surprised at how well he tells Joe’s story, from puberty to present day, with humour and (sometimes) sensitivity.

It is an interesting look at sex addiction and what it might be like to live that way. It’s not all fun and games apparently, as Joe alienates herself from the people she loves, loses the way and ultimately ends up in some horrible predicaments. For more, I reviewed it here after I saw it at the cinema.

gonegirl-poster

Gone Girl

Director: David Fincher

IMDB Synopsis: With his wife’s disappearance having become the focus of an intense media circus, a man sees the spotlight turned on him when it’s suspected that he may not be innocent.

My Thoughts:

God, I really enjoyed Gone Girl which is exactly what I said about the book by Gillian Flynn. It’s only until the very end that I threw the print version across the room in frustration and I remain in the same frame of mind about David Fincher‘s interpretation.

I am resolutely not going to talk about what happens for fear of shocking spoiler alerts but I will say that Batfleck was ingenious casting, given the nature of the character of Nick Dunne. Ms. Pike is beautiful and unbalanced, again sweet casting for Amazing Amy.

All in all, I think this was done well and presents a fuller picture of the relationship between the two main characters than the book does.

chef-movie_sc

Chef

Director: Jon Favreau

IMDB Synopsis: A chef who loses his restaurant job starts up a food truck in an effort to reclaim his creative promise, while piecing back together his estranged family.

My Thoughts:

Chef is adorable and probably the most cheery film on this list. I mean so far we’ve had nothing but murder, abduction, missing persons, sex addiction and cocks. Sometimes you need a rainbow, am I right? Here’s your rainbow – Chef has feel good written all over it.

What I really liked were all the little technical flourishes as chef Carl Casper gets to grips with social media (such as the onscreen Twitter messages that pop up from time to time) and the power it wields, whilst also trying to be a good dad and something of a success. I want to watch this again soon, just because and I want to stuff my face with cheese whilst doing it.

honeymoon3

Honeymoon

Director: Leigh Janiak

IMDB Synopsis: A newlywed couple finds their lake-country honeymoon descend into chaos after Paul finds Bea wandering and disoriented in the middle of their first night.

My Thoughts:

Honeymoon is another film I don’t want to go into too much depth about. I went in knowing absolutely nothing about it and I think my experience was all the better for it.

I will say that it has a deep sadness to it, even now I feel a little heavy-hearted thinking about how the story unfolds. Beautifully shot and starring lovely Ingritte from Game of Thrones, it will leave you wondering a lot of things.

babadook_ver3_xlg

The Babadook

Director: Jennifer Kent

IMDB Synopsis: A single mother, plagued by the violent death of her husband, battles with her son’s fear of a monster lurking in the house, but soon discovers a sinister presence all around her.

My Thoughts:

I’ve never seen my husband more freaked out than he was whilst watching The Babadook. He disappeared for 20 minutes in the middle to ‘do a few things’ because he couldn’t face what was unfurling before him.

I wasn’t quite as terrified as I had expected to be but this is a movie experience so multi-layered and original that it sticks with you. I feel like a small piece of The Babadook followed me around for a few days afterward, forcing me to think about it continually.

The performances, of both Essie Davis and Noah Wiseman, are incredible and the ending is left to the viewer’s own interpretation, something I love. There is nothing worse than being spoon fed all the answers. The antidote to all the Insidious (Chapter 1 through 68)/Sinister/Annabelle style films that just never live up to hype. If you love your horror, check it out asap.

begin-again-movie-poster-wallpaper

Begin Again (2013)

Director: John Carney

IMDB Synopsis: A chance encounter between a disgraced music-business executive and a young singer-songwriter new to Manhattan turns into a promising collaboration between the two talents.

My Thoughts:

Another rainbow drop, I’m not going to lie. This was a Sunday afternoon treat while I pottered about and the main draw was Knightley, because I love me some Knightley (remember?).

It turned out to be a really pleasant ride with a decent soundtrack. Even James Corden the Hollywood Actor didn’t bug me (I like him as a writer and comedian, okay?) but look, of course it was going to be.

It’s nice, hopeful and sweet – and it’s about finding yourself so what’s not to like? If you’re not into musicals or sunshine then perhaps you should skip it. But ask yourself this, do you hate joy?

*giggle*

under-the-skin-poster

Under the Skin (2013)

Director: Jonathan Glazer

IMDB Synopsis: A mysterious woman seduces lonely men in the evening hours in Scotland. Events lead her to begin a process of self-discovery.

My Thoughts:

I feel like I need to watch this again because it was very good but I couldn’t coherently explain what happens in it. I won’t spoil this for anyone who hasn’t seen it but it is that rare type of movie that isn’t enjoyable per se but actually makes you think.

After I’d seen it, and at times I willed it to end – it was fucking odd, confusing and uncomfortable – I considered it long and hard and I’d say it’s one of the best films I saw last year. Weird review?

“I didn’t really enjoy it, it made me uncomfortable and I didn’t understand it – but it was the best film of 2014” ~ A Voluptuous Mind on Under The Skin, January 2015

Sounds fair. As for Ms. Johansson, what does one say? She’s stunning, sexual and at times (in other movies), not great. In this she appears, for reasons that will become clear (or maybe not), like a duck out of water and this calls for an unusual demeanor, which suits her range well.

I notice that this has appeared on quite a few ‘best of’ lists and I agree. It’s brilliant. But also, all those other things I said.

And that’s my list.

What also nearly made the list but then got bumped: Boyhood, Edge of TomorrowStarred Up and Obvious Child. The rest of the films I saw throughout the year were pretty meh. I don’t know if you can say it was a fine year for film or not – but it was okay.

Tusk-1

My final word: prize for the most bizarre, cray, enjoyable pile of shit movie of the year goes hands (flipper?) down to Tusk. Mental.

You? Tell me a bit about your favourites!